The Coalition Continues to Service the Custodian Chief Executive’s
International Persona to Advance Stated Objectives
and
More Evidence of the Canadian Leader’s Iconic Status in the
Top Echelon of Global Power, Wealth and Influence
© 2010 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
It’s a unique and useful exercise to examine both sides of celebrity, and in particular supra-celebrity. Some let fame go to their heads and they become arrogant, aloof and ugly. Others have backgrounds that prevent that personality from emerging and while relishing the spotlight and the perks that come with it continue to live their lives humble, grateful and productively. The coalition found in the Custodian Chief the latter, which only further boosted his credibility. In most circles of global power, wealth and influence he’s admired and appreciated; in others thoroughly adored. And these two sentiments have continued to fuel the need to regularly service his international persona for the purpose of compelling nemeses of democracy, rule of law and human rights to repeatedly remember what they’re up against and under no circumstances will they success or escape accountability.
In the minds of billions of people around the world, he’s unknown. However, amongst the upper tier of global movers and shakers he’s not only known but also has been elevated to the pinnacle of attention, respect and appreciation. Remarkable to many in the coalition partnership is that his iconic status never affected him personally or professionally. Instead of being full of himself he’s remained humble, but confident; and he’s been observed to be resolutely determined but never resting on his laurels. Some within that exclusive group existentially understand why he is that way; because they too came from dire hardship and unrequited want and appreciate what was bestowed upon them through hard work and somewhere along the way a stroke or two of sheer luck.
To him, these dynamics played a part. However, the deciding factor is having been rescued, to this point cognitively, from what two decades of enslaving, torturous and depriving human experimentation delivered. His profound appreciation and work ethic was procured by witnessing day after day for years foreigners spending so much time, effort, expense and extraordinary creativity on him and his country.
Additionally as an academic he understood that Triple “E” initiatives weren’t so much about him but had less a self-interest than in the circumstances a self-preservation, dimension. The point is made in Diplomatically Embraced Multi-Decade Oppressed Lawyers are 2-for-2 Fundamentally Reforming Government: Canadian Lawyer on the Verge of Making It 3-for-3:
The biographies of Gandhi and Mandela are widely known and their remarkable achievements well understood because their contributions reforming the two Commonwealth countries were heavily publicized. The common perception is that their iconic status evolved primarily because of the recognition given to the inordinate amount of pain they endured at the hands of the enthusiastically arrogant, witnessing the power of their personalities and marveling at their undeterrable resolve to achieve democratic reform. However, that is only a minor part of the formula. The more substantive reality is that the international community ‘chose’ them to achieve its goals by repeatedly disseminating knowledge about the oppression they suffered and their relentless efforts. The purpose of doing so was not so much to alleviate their respective personal nihilistic situations than to exploit their experiences and bootstrap their reform attempts into global rallying cries for government deconstruction, political accountability and the complete reconstitution of the state.
The unedified would balk at the argument someone the world has never heard of received many of the highest honors civilization has. However, once in possession of the Fiefdom treatise and the diplomacy archive and they grasp both in their entirety, the idea that someone like the Custodian Chief being elevated to historic status isn’t so laughable; that it all makes sense. They’d see the two primary differences between him and his two Commonwealth predecessors: (i) South Africa and India never posed a global threat like Chinada does and (ii) world leaders, multi-national corporate executives, market participants, financers and investors etc. have collectively decided there are too many adverse consequences of disclosing publicly that The Soviet Union the Sequel is upon us, including the development, deployment and proliferation of stealth cognition technologies. There is an unchallengeable logic to a solution that involves only “limited transparency”.
There is one event in which the upper echelon of world power and wealth meet each year: Davos Switzerland. It’s a venue that is secluded and by invitation only; and where the movers and shakers in the public and private sectors of many nations can interact without the prying eyes of the media; where deals get discussed and consummated that affect how the world works and evolves. Undeniably, China and Canada the global menace has been on the agenda since the meeting in January 2007.
Maria Bartiromo: Multi-Tasking from the 2007 World
Economic Forum in Davos Switzerland
© 2007 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
Maria may have been on the other side of the world attending the annual World Economic Forum, but her thoughts were with the coalition. She introduced a segment featuring an interview with Bill Gates and began it using the partnership’s discourse:
Bill Gates has led a coalition of governments around the world and businesses around the world to raise money for vaccines.
With coalition activity being what it has been for the last year there can’t be any doubt that the topic of Chinada was a central point of discussion and debate amongst the attendees. As Maria put it in a January 29, 2007 Business Week article “With the world beset by more ills that Job, there is no shortage of issues for CEO’s, prime ministers and academics to wrestle at this year’s “Annual Meeting”…”.
Davos World Economic Forum 2008: Another Opportunity for Coalition Partners to
Meet, Recruit and Show Chinada’s ‘Business as Usual’ Nose Thumbing
and Belligerent Their Days Are Numbered
© 2008 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
On Saturday morning, January 25, 2008 the Canadian lawyer was reminded how important Davos 2007 was and also how much Davos 2008 was going to build on that success and be even more efficacious in bringing the spotlight of diplomatic transparency on the Chinada threat. The week-long event kicked off with a BBC program involving a sit-down discussion with a panel, including former Treasury Secretary John Snow. He executed a Blitzer Maneuver during the audience-attended discussion to show he was helping advance coalition interests and objectives. BBC producers also helped, editing the film to include clips of panel members executing Clooney Maneuvers. The host was attired in prison certainty, condemnation and justice, which certainty set the geo-political tone of the event.
One attendee executed an Olmert-Spielberg Maneuver to one of Mahatma Gandhi’s famous sayings to draw attention to the sociopathic in Canada who just can’t get enough of power and wealth and decided to engage in some of the most serious transgressions of law and morality to get more:
The world can sustain the world’s need but the world cannot sustain the world’s greed.
2010 was no different, as evidenced by real time interaction between the CNBC team on site and linked to the East-West Corridor of Diplomacy. To witness what was happening on the other side of the world as it occurred – between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m. PT – required the Custodian Chief reorienting his body clocks to be up during these early hours of the morning. What made the transition even more necessary was the fact the Australian Open, tennis’ first Grand Slam championship of the year, was live during this time slot and heavily geo-politicized: The 2010 Australian Open Tennis Championship: Another Instance Where the World’s Professional Athletes Contribute to Achieving the Coalition’s Stated Objectives; and Tennis World Number One Roger Federer to the Chinada High Command: The Coalition is “Going to Crush You”.
Another window into how the World Economic Forum became a meeting place to discuss the Chinada threat was revealed during a February 14th segment of ’60 Minutes’. Scott Pelley went to Davos and interviewed not only its founder and several attendees, but also a coalition partner since November 14, 2007, as documented in
Welcoming Global Advertising Giant Sir Martin Sorell to the Triple “E” Family
© 2007 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
There was no denying that Sir Martin had been invited to join the Triple “E” family. He appeared as a guest host on CNBC’s Squawk Box Europe late evening on November 13, 2007 – already November 14 in London – and employed so many of the Triple “E” diplomatic lexicon’s elements and so often that it was obvious he had been brought into the Fiefdom information loop.
The first indication he was a member came when he executed a Clooney Maneuver to what Squawk host Jeff was saying; and sparked by him using the phrase “the problems” – which is what the China-Canada military alliance is causing a world seeking peace and security. He executed a Blair Maneuver to the phrase “they have to come together” – which was stated twice; what precisely he was referring to was unclear; the primary likelihood was the coalition of world leaders, major corporations, the wealthy and high profile.
When Jeff stated “it’s useful to have you at the table”, Sir Martin executed a Clooney Maneuver – conveying his views on the Canadian lawyer being involved in containing and neutralizing the Chinada threat and turning Canada into a democratic state.
That was followed by a succession of diplomatic gestures – Olmert-Spielberg, Pfeiffer and Blair Maneuvers.
Sir Martin executed an Olmert-Spielberg Maneuver to “there are many ways of dealing with it”, which was his way of saying there are a plethora of options available for the coalition to protect its interests and achieve its objectives – many if not all which have been articulated in the Fiefdom treatise.
e also added a Clooney Maneuver to “they’ve become premium performers” – another reference to the Canadian and a compliment to his contributions to the coalition.
After a rapid-fire three Clooney Maneuvers, he stated “we wait with baited breath [Kernan M.]” – in other words, he and his colleagues are on the edge of their seats to see who wins this next clash of civilizations.
A review of his curriculum vitae reveals he is both an acclaimed academic, a recipient of the Harvard Business School’s highest honor, the Alumni Achievement Award, and a world leader in his field. His knighthood confirms he is someone of exceptional value to the coalition and, of course, its partners are excited he’s joined.
What made the geo-political initiative in 2010 much more substantial was the fact that only a week or so ago Canada’s wealthiest family – now worth something like $24 billion – went on record as encouraging satanic cult worship: How the Sign of the Devil – 666 – Was Incorporated into the 2010 Olympics by the Chinada High Command and its Thomson-Owned CTV Network; or Welcome to Dogville’s 2010 Evil-ympics; and Retrospective: How the Fiefdom Treatise Concluded Canada’s Paradigm of Governance Involved an Evil-Worshipping Cult and The Anatomy of the Thomson CTV Evil-ympics Television Promo.
Scott scripted a question that appears not to have been shared with the interviewee in advance – a practice often used to generate Triple “E” content. Sir Martin offers a spontaneous description of the Custodian Chief after being prompted only with a combination 'we're gonna f _ _ k you up good' Powell Maneuver and ‘gun to the temple’ Richie-Santelli Maneuver:
Scott: How did [the founder] pull this [event] together?
Sir Martin: Well, I think he had the vision. I mean like in everything in life, you have a strong vision.
Scott: [9:25: protracted Powell-R-S M.] But he didn't exactly pull this together with the force of his charisma?
Sir Martin: Ah, I think [Cl.M.] that's a little bit unfair. [laughs]
Scott: [R-S M.; chuckling] You know what I mean.
Sir Martin: If you'd been a larger than life character or personality, which is the sort of thing you're getting at, maybe he wouldn't have been able to do this.
